home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: lnzx16.vai.co.at!usenet
- From: krendl@vai.co.at (Helmut Krendl)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: 29 Jan 1996 10:30:42 GMT
- Organization: Voest Alpine Industrieanlagenbau GmbH.
- Message-ID: <4ei7ki$s5l@lnzx16.vai.co.at>
- References: <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no>
- Reply-To: krendl@vai.co.at
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lnzx33.vai.co.at
-
- In article <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no>, balchen@sn.no (Jens Balchen Jr.) writes:
- > charles stoyer <cstoyer@interpex.com> decided to share with us
- > the infinite reservoars of wisdom:
- >
- > >BASIC stands for "Beginners All-purpose ? Interpretive Code"
- >
- > Actually it's "Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code".
- > But VB does not deserve the name BASIC. I can't understand why
- > the stupid masses still think of VB as BASIC.
- >
- > Jens
- > --
- > Everything I said are the opinions of someone else.
- > I just cut-and-pasted.
- >
- > Jens Balchen jr. http://www.sn.no/~balchen
- > balchen@sn.no http://www.sn.no/~balchen/vb/visual.htm
- >
-
- I don't understand but do you mean the stupid masses of people who use all
- the reliable (guaranted protection violation every day) M$ software.
-
- Helmut
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-